They're here! More Muvipix.com Guides by Steve Grisetti!
The Muvipix.com Guides to Premiere & Photoshop Elements 2024
As well as The Muvipix.com Guide to CyberLink PowerDirector 21
Because there are stories to tell
muvipix.com

Comparing Some Red River Inkjet Photo Papers

Hardware, software, and methods for displaying & distributing your creations.

Comparing Some Red River Inkjet Photo Papers

Postby George Tyndall » Fri Oct 22, 2010 10:38 pm

I do mostly low-key, in-studio portrait photography on a black background. I use the resulting stills to create both 6x9-inch images on 8.5x11 paper and slide shows consisting of the clients’ stills set to music. Because all of the stills include pan and zoom, the clients refer to their slide shows as “music videos.”

For this research, I wanted to see which of a number of papers would give the best result for the following low-key image: A woman with very black hair reclining on a dark-blue pillow wearing black garments, all on a black background. Specifically, I wanted to determine which paper would best separate the dark colors from one another but leave the model’s skin properly exposed (not washed out) as in the image on the monitor.

All the papers are from Red River Paper’s “Complete Sample Kit” <www.redriverpaper.com> which markets “Premium Photographic Inkjet Media” and which I learned of from moderator gpecht.

All were printed with an Epson Artisan 50 inkjet printer using Claria inks with the printer controlling the color and the printer settings for each paper as advised by Red River.

All the printed images, and the monitor, were viewed under one and the same ambient light, namely, high-intensity fluorescents of the same color temperature as sunlight (the same lights that I use for my studio portraiture).

I’ve listed them in rank order of their ability to separate the dark colors from one another and, especially, for the ability to maintain the most detail in the black hair, all the while maintaining the same color for the model’s skin as on the monitor.

--60lb. Premium Matte PLUS
--64lb. Aurora Natural
--68lb. Arctic Polar Satin 2.0
--66lb. Arctic Polar Satin
--66lb. Arctic Polar Gloss
--66lb. Polar Pearl Metallic
--75lb. Arctic Polar Luster
--68lb. Ultra Pro Gloss
--53lb. Premium Gloss
--32lb. Premium Gloss
--60lb. River Linen
--60lb. Paper Canvas
--60lb. Cordovan Textured Gloss (textured surface makes the model’s skin appear “muddied”)

With the exception of the last on the list, the differences among the various papers are extremely subtle. All but the last gave a VERY satisfactory result in comparison with the image on the monitor. One could, therefore, make one’s selection according to price and/or the client’s preferred texture of the paper and not go wrong.

With regard to Print Life, Red River states that, if the recommendatons for care of the ink manufacturer are followed, then the Print Life should be as stated by the manufacturer of the ink.

I did not test all the papers in the sample kit. The Complete Sample Kit includes over 30 different papers including gloss, matte, satin, semigloss, artistic and specialty for $14.99 (Item 9998). For easy subsequent identification, each paper comes with its description printed in the lower-right corner (2 samples of each type of paper).

:hat:
HP h8-1360t Win7 Home Premium 64-bit/Intel i7-3770@3.40GHz/8GB RAM/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/LG BH10LS30 Blu-ray RW+SD DVD/CD RW+LightScribe/52" Samsung LCD HDTV (ancient 1080p)/PRE & PSE & ORGANIZER 2018/CS 5.1 & 5.5 (rare use) ::wav::
User avatar
George Tyndall
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Comparing Some Red River Inkjet Photo Papers

Postby Gerlinde » Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:46 pm

Wow George, you really got into that! :-D

Great review, thanks for posting this. Those sample kits are the gift that gives on giving :TU:

I noticed a couple of new names in your list, I think I have to order a new kit. I'm not printing enough. I still have paper for the next couple of years. ::C
A) i7-3930K 3.2GHz (3.8GHz Turbo), 32GB DDR3-1600, SSD 256GB, 2x1TB+2x2TB Seagate Barracuda (72krpm), Geforce GTX 550 Ti (1GB), Win10 Pro 64-bit
B) Sony Vaio i7-3632QM,12gb DDR3-1333MHz, GeForce® GT 640M LE (2GB), 750GB (7200rpm), Win10 Pro64-bit
User avatar
Gerlinde
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1018
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:45 pm
Location: San Diego,CA


Return to Video/Photo/Music Viewing and Sharing 


Similar topics


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests