They're here! More Muvipix.com Guides by Steve Grisetti!
The Muvipix.com Guides to Premiere & Photoshop Elements 2024
As well as The Muvipix.com Guide to CyberLink PowerDirector 21
Because there are stories to tell
muvipix.com

885x480 - can't find in Steve's books

Specific to Premiere Elements Version 8.

885x480 - can't find in Steve's books

Postby Petey » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:26 am

Hi Steve or Chuck,

I must be going crazy but when I look in Steve's two books for PE8, I can't find where he mentioned to resize images at 855x480 for DV widescreen? Could you please tell me the page number?

thanks,

Petey

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
Petey
New User
New User
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:05 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: 885x480 - can't find in Steve's books

Postby Chuck Engels » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:27 am

I use 864 x 480 myself :)
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory.

2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
User avatar
Chuck Engels
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 18155
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 885x480 - can't find in Steve's books

Postby Steve Grisetti » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:39 am

That's because I don't, Petey.

Photos are generally 4:3 images. Resizing them to 16:9 would entail either distorting them or cropping them.

If you use the 1000x750 pixels size we recommend, you can fill your 16:9 screen and and, by scaling and position, you can decide then if and how much you want to trim from your photo.

On the other hand, if you're creating a graphic to fill a 16:9 video frame -- then, yes, 855x480 (give or take a pixel) should fill the frame.

Does that help?
HP Envy with 2.9/4.4 ghz i7-10700 and 16 gig of RAM running Windows 11 Pro
User avatar
Steve Grisetti
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 14444
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:11 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Re: 885x480 - can't find in Steve's books

Postby Petey » Sat Dec 18, 2010 2:35 pm

Thanks Steve,

Funny, I thought I saw those dimension numbers in your book since I've been using 855x480 since I got your books. I wonder where I saw that. It's old age creeping in on me. I think I will add a few more pixels like Chuck uses. Actually, I was cropping my photos in Photoshop to that size so they weren't distorted. You're trick might be easier since I can make the adjustments in the program.

Petey

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
Petey
New User
New User
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:05 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada


Return to PRE Version 8 


Similar topics


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests