I noticed that this is a Panasonic camera and my experience with an earlier model Panasonic still camera is that it did something which seemed weird to me - record Motion JPEG (MJPEG) video format and write it out in a .mov file (wrapper) instead of a .avi file. I suspect that is what happened here.
I think that another muvipix participant will know more about the current Panasonic cameras video. So my comments here are merely a start to this discussion. I was looking for more detail about this camera, so I went to the dcresource.com review site. A specific reference for its discussion of the video is
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/panas ... view/using For HD recording, it looks like it is 1280x720 and
there are two codecs to choose from, each offering their own pros and cons. Here's a quick summary:
* AVCHD Lite
o Pros: Unlimited recording time (outside of Europe), high quality, easy viewing on Blu-ray players or HDTVs
o Cons: Difficult to edit, can only be played back on certain devices
* Motion JPEG
o Pros: Easy to edit and share, viewable on almost all devices/platforms
o Cons: Limited recording time, larger file sizes
However, I think this commentary misses an important point. Which format gives better quality?
-- Yes, AVCHD Lite may be more difficult to edit, but you have Premiere Elements 8 so if the AVCHD Lite gives better quality I suggest that it is worth considering.
-- the referenced web page review shows "three AVCHD Lite movies, taken at the highest quality setting. I used Handbrake to convert them to easily viewable MPEG-4 files". So he does offer a suggestion of a conversion program.
egitelman,
Now I think I have answered your question as to why it imported as an .mov file, but I don't know about the mpeg2. There may be other workflow scenarios so I recommend that you stay subscribed to this thread while I ask for assistance from another muvipix member.