They're here! More Muvipix.com Guides by Steve Grisetti!
The Muvipix.com Guides to Premiere & Photoshop Elements 2024
As well as The Muvipix.com Guide to CyberLink PowerDirector 21
Because there are stories to tell
muvipix.com

Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Talk about computer software/hardware problems, related to digital video or otherwise.

Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby George Tyndall » Fri May 02, 2014 10:02 pm

Here is an example of why I am reluctant to install even "important" checkmarked Windows updates like 2964358


Windows Updates 2014 0502.JPG



Known issues with this security update
•Internet Explorer will crash if you try to install this security update on a Windows 7-based system that does not already have security update 2929437 installed. To avoid this issue, take either of the following actions: ◦Install security update 2929437, and then install security update 2964358. For more information about security update 2929437, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
2929437

Description of the security update for Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2: April 8, 2014


P.S. I do no have 2929437 installed.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
HP h8-1360t Win7 Home Premium 64-bit/Intel i7-3770@3.40GHz/8GB RAM/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/LG BH10LS30 Blu-ray RW+SD DVD/CD RW+LightScribe/52" Samsung LCD HDTV (ancient 1080p)/PRE & PSE & ORGANIZER 2018/CS 5.1 & 5.5 (rare use) ::wav::
User avatar
George Tyndall
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby Steve Grisetti » Sat May 03, 2014 8:45 am

Sort of the same reason I DO install every available update.

So I guess there are arguments on both sides.
HP Envy with 2.9/4.4 ghz i7-10700 and 16 gig of RAM running Windows 11 Pro
User avatar
Steve Grisetti
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 14442
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:11 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby George Tyndall » Sat May 03, 2014 11:57 am

Steve Grisetti wrote:Sort of the same reason I DO install every available update.

So I guess there are arguments on both sides.


Have you actually verified that you have it installed, Steve?

Neither my employer's machines, which are running Win7 Pro, nor mine, which are running Win7 Home Premium, have 2929437 installed.

Also, aren't you running Win8 rather than Win7?

According to the "fine print" quoted in my post, it's only Win7 machines that will be adversely affected.
HP h8-1360t Win7 Home Premium 64-bit/Intel i7-3770@3.40GHz/8GB RAM/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/LG BH10LS30 Blu-ray RW+SD DVD/CD RW+LightScribe/52" Samsung LCD HDTV (ancient 1080p)/PRE & PSE & ORGANIZER 2018/CS 5.1 & 5.5 (rare use) ::wav::
User avatar
George Tyndall
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby Bob » Sat May 03, 2014 2:30 pm

2929437 is specifically for IE 11. It doesn't apply to earlier versions of IE. If you have an earlier version of IE, you do not have it and don't need it. The warning applies if you are using IE 11 on Windows 7. If you get your update through Windows Update, you don't need to worry as it will not be presented to you with the checkbox enabled if you don't have all the prerequisites. This warning is mainly for those that bypass Windows Update and download and apply specific updates.

All versions of IE are vulnerable and need to be patched with 2964358. Even those on Windows 8. It's 2929437 that isn't an issue on Windows 8. 2964358 will make appropriate patches for the specific version of IE being updated.
User avatar
Bob
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:49 am
Location: Southern California, USA

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby George Tyndall » Sat May 03, 2014 4:10 pm

Bob wrote:All versions of IE are vulnerable and need to be patched with 2964358. Even those on Windows 8. It's 2929437 that isn't an issue on Windows 8. 2964358 will make appropriate patches for the specific version of IE being updated.


Thank you very much for clarifying that, Bob, as the text from Microsoft is anything but clear.

"either of the following actions..."--but then only one 2-step action is presented. :conf:
HP h8-1360t Win7 Home Premium 64-bit/Intel i7-3770@3.40GHz/8GB RAM/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/LG BH10LS30 Blu-ray RW+SD DVD/CD RW+LightScribe/52" Samsung LCD HDTV (ancient 1080p)/PRE & PSE & ORGANIZER 2018/CS 5.1 & 5.5 (rare use) ::wav::
User avatar
George Tyndall
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby George Tyndall » Sat May 03, 2014 7:20 pm

Bob wrote:2929437 is specifically for IE 11. It doesn't apply to earlier versions of IE. If you have an earlier version of IE, you do not have it and don't need it. The warning applies if you are using IE 11 on Windows 7. If you get your update through Windows Update, you don't need to worry as it will not be presented to you with the checkbox enabled if you don't have all the prerequisites. This warning is mainly for those that bypass Windows Update and download and apply specific updates.

All versions of IE are vulnerable and need to be patched with 2964358. Even those on Windows 8. It's 2929437 that isn't an issue on Windows 8. 2964358 will make appropriate patches for the specific version of IE being updated.


Hi Bob,

Please take a look at the following image:

Windows Updates 2014 0503 for Bob.JPG


Note that 2964358 is not check marked despite the fact you've stated "All versions of IE are vulnerable and need to be patched with 2964358."

I am currently using, and happy wity, IE9.

But Windows is asking me, with a checkmark, to update to IE 11.

But because I am using IE9, I do not have 2929437 installed.

Questions:

1) Is there any compelling reason, at this time, to update my system to IE 11?

2) Will my system crash if I do so?

3) I do not use Skype. Is there any compelling reason to allows this "important" update?

:tx:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
HP h8-1360t Win7 Home Premium 64-bit/Intel i7-3770@3.40GHz/8GB RAM/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/LG BH10LS30 Blu-ray RW+SD DVD/CD RW+LightScribe/52" Samsung LCD HDTV (ancient 1080p)/PRE & PSE & ORGANIZER 2018/CS 5.1 & 5.5 (rare use) ::wav::
User avatar
George Tyndall
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby TreeTopsRanch » Sun May 04, 2014 12:43 pm

I can think of one reason for updating to the latest version of IE. Security holes are plugged with later versions.
User avatar
TreeTopsRanch
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 6:57 pm

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby Bob » Sun May 04, 2014 10:22 pm

2964358 is not checked for me either and I'm using IE 10. IE does need to be patched. But, there's usually a reason Microsoft does not enable a patch. I've generally found it's best not to force an update. Woody Leonard (http://www.askwoody.com) recommends using another browser for now and see how the IE update shakes out first.

My Windows update also has IE 11 for Windows 7 checked, but I'm holding off for now. There have been a number of problems with IE 11 on Windows 7 systems -- expecially with 64-bit windows. I'll eventually upgrade when it looks like things have settled down. In the meantime, I have Chrome.
User avatar
Bob
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:49 am
Location: Southern California, USA

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby George Tyndall » Tue May 06, 2014 1:00 am

Bob wrote:2964358 is not checked for me either and I'm using IE 10. IE does need to be patched. But, there's usually a reason Microsoft does not enable a patch. I've generally found it's best not to force an update. Woody Leonard (http://www.askwoody.com) recommends using another browser for now and see how the IE update shakes out first.

My Windows update also has IE 11 for Windows 7 checked, but I'm holding off for now. There have been a number of problems with IE 11 on Windows 7 systems -- expecially with 64-bit windows. I'll eventually upgrade when it looks like things have settled down. In the meantime, I have Chrome.


Thanks for that reply.

I've been avoiding all Google products, including its search engine, because a software engineer once said to me:

"It's scary how much Google knows about those who use its products."

Exaggeration and hyperbole?

If there truly is a reason for concern with Google, is it okay to use Firefox instead while MS sorts out the IE issues?

BTW, please note that the first time I looked, there was a checkmark in the box, but the second time (the middle image) there was not. When I looked again just now, the checkmark is back, but I'm still holding off as you suggest.

Bob 050514.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
HP h8-1360t Win7 Home Premium 64-bit/Intel i7-3770@3.40GHz/8GB RAM/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/LG BH10LS30 Blu-ray RW+SD DVD/CD RW+LightScribe/52" Samsung LCD HDTV (ancient 1080p)/PRE & PSE & ORGANIZER 2018/CS 5.1 & 5.5 (rare use) ::wav::
User avatar
George Tyndall
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby Bob » Tue May 06, 2014 2:27 am

The patch is enabled on my Windows Update now, too. Looks like Microsoft updated it Monday. I'm going to wait a little be longer to be sure it isn't going to be a problem. Woody, recommends applying the patch on Windows XP systems now. I'm using Chrome, but Firefox is fine too.

Google does know a lot about it's users. The same can be said of any of the major search engines. But, unless you have a Google account and are logged into a Google service, it's not tied to you individually. But, don't forget that the web sites you visit can also obtain tracking information and the cookies that are created can be used for tracking. Those aren't a Google issue. I'm sure Microsoft and Yahoo do similar things and don't forget Facebook. And, then there are the three major credit score companies...
User avatar
Bob
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:49 am
Location: Southern California, USA

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby Chris B » Tue May 06, 2014 1:14 pm

An interesting plugin for Firefox is lightbeam.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... lightbeam/

Install it an it will graphically represent all the "connections" that you make whilst going about your online business and see how data is shared between companies.
Intel Core i7 8700 - 32GB DDR4 - 500GB Evo 970 SSD - 3+2 TB HDD - GTX 1080- MSI Z370 Pro - Win10 64 bit - Cannon HV30 (PAL) - Sony A6000 - GoPro 3 Black
User avatar
Chris B
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby _Paz_ » Tue May 06, 2014 4:16 pm

Google does know a lot about it's users. The same can be said of any of the major search engines. But, unless you have a Google account and are logged into a Google service, it's not tied to you individually.


Doesn't Google run Chrome? I thought about trying out Chrome but it wanted me to create a membership and give them my email address. I decided to stick with Firefox. If I had to give FF any personal information I don't remember it.
Lenovo W70l; 1.6 GHz, i7 quad core, Win 7, 64 bit, 16 gigs DDR-3 RAM; NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800; Two 1T 7200 internal drives; BluRay burner
User avatar
_Paz_
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:32 pm
Location: Central Alabama, USA NTSC

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby Bob » Tue May 06, 2014 8:53 pm

Google does own Chrome. But, you don't need a Google account to run the Chrome browser. I don't have one.
User avatar
Bob
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:49 am
Location: Southern California, USA

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby _Paz_ » Fri May 09, 2014 8:36 am

I guess I already have a Google account. Seems I had to create a G mail address to sign up to post videos on YouTube. Not that I use that email address.

It's been a while now but it sure seems like I remember backing out when they wanted my email address.
Lenovo W70l; 1.6 GHz, i7 quad core, Win 7, 64 bit, 16 gigs DDR-3 RAM; NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800; Two 1T 7200 internal drives; BluRay burner
User avatar
_Paz_
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:32 pm
Location: Central Alabama, USA NTSC

Re: Cauton re Windows Security Update 2964358

Postby George Tyndall » Thu May 15, 2014 4:52 am

Bob wrote:The patch is enabled on my Windows Update now, too. Looks like Microsoft updated it Monday. I'm going to wait a little be longer to be sure it isn't going to be a problem.


Here is the latest set of checkmarks--and 2964358 is no longer on the list.

However, both an update to my IE9 and IE11 are checked.

Can you make any sense of this and then advise me?

Thank you.

Bob 051514.JPG


Note: Snip added after Bob's following reply.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
HP h8-1360t Win7 Home Premium 64-bit/Intel i7-3770@3.40GHz/8GB RAM/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/LG BH10LS30 Blu-ray RW+SD DVD/CD RW+LightScribe/52" Samsung LCD HDTV (ancient 1080p)/PRE & PSE & ORGANIZER 2018/CS 5.1 & 5.5 (rare use) ::wav::
User avatar
George Tyndall
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Next

Return to Computer Issues 


Similar topics


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron