They're here! More Muvipix.com Guides by Steve Grisetti!
The Muvipix.com Guides to Premiere & Photoshop Elements 2024
As well as The Muvipix.com Guide to CyberLink PowerDirector 21
Because there are stories to tell
muvipix.com

Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Talk about anything here.

Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Gerry » Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:41 pm

Hi, gang --
It's been ages since I've been here. Been limping along on a 6-year-old Win XP computer with Prel 4 for the past few years, recording my video on an old Canon Mini DV. And enjoying it.

Recently upgraded to a new Win 7 machine (i7 3.4ghz processor) and decided it was time to upgrade everything else. After taking a great trip to Alaska last summer and watching the disappointing video quality on our 1080 TV, I went out and bought a new DSLR that shoots Full HD video (1080 @ 30fps, MPEG on SD card). I even upgraded to Prel 9. We have another Alaska trip scheduled for next summer, and I want the video to be spectacular.

Then I realized there was no way to watch the movies on the HD TV unless I burned them to Blu-Ray. I was totally shocked to see how few BD burners are available out there. And that got me to wondering: was I assuming that 1080 HD home videos and burners are much farther developed than they are? I guess I expected to see a boatload of BD burners because seemingly HD camcorders are the only things available any more. Is it still in its infancy?

Did I make a mistake buying the DLSR? How is everyone else watching their PREL-produced HD videos? Or am I headed in the right direction and should just buy one of the BD burners and get set to watch my spectacular HD videos?

Confused!
Dell XPS 8500 desktop w/ Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.4ghz / 22 gigs RAM / Radeon HD7570 1g dedicated video memory/ PrEl 11 & 9 / Photoshop and Illustrator CS5 / After Effects CS4 / Olympus OM-D E-M5 DSLR (1080i HD video)

Time is money, life is change.
User avatar
Gerry
Senior Contributor
Senior Contributor
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: Minnetonka, MN

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Chuck Engels » Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:44 pm

I bought a very nice LG bluray burner, works great.
If I don't want to connect the camcorder directly to view the video that way then I edit and burn to a Bluray disc.
I think you are headed in the right direction, don't let the lack of options worry you :)

Here's mine, works great
http://astore.amazon.com/chuckengelsco- ... B004LPLE50
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory.

2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
User avatar
Chuck Engels
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 18154
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Chris B » Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:12 pm

I've got an LG as well - works fine. I burn BluRays for archive purposes (1080i 50fps) and play the ISOs from my nettop PC under the TV. I think a lot of people are moving to the media-centre/NAS/cloud storage model rather than burning disks these days.
Intel Core i7 8700 - 32GB DDR4 - 500GB Evo 970 SSD - 3+2 TB HDD - GTX 1080- MSI Z370 Pro - Win10 64 bit - Cannon HV30 (PAL) - Sony A6000 - GoPro 3 Black
User avatar
Chris B
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Dave McElderry » Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:54 pm

Nothing against LG, but here's another that I can personally vouch for. I've been using it for several months with zero issues. I have no idea if the higher price translates to better quality - only time will tell. But I do know that Sony has an excellent reputation in their drives.

http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Blu-ray-Inte ... B004HYFOI8
Be yourself; everyone else is taken.

Asus X570-E motherboard; AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 3.8 GHz; 64GB DDR4; GeForce RTX 2060 6GB; 1TB Samsung 970 Pro M.2 SSD
User avatar
Dave McElderry
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4758
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 10:18 am
Location: Lost In Middle America

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby John 'twosheds' McDonald » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:13 am

Being a bit of an early adopter I also have an LG BD burner that I bought a few years ago. Never had any problems with it (but they are noticeably cheaper these days :-D ).

I also use a DLNA compliant Synology NAS for, amongst other things, streaming video to my 1080p TVs so, as ChrisB says, burning a BD isn't always necessary.
AMD Ryzen 3900x 12C/24T, ASUS x570 mobo, Arctic Liquid Freezer ll 280, Win11 64 bit, 64GB RAM, Radeon RX 570 graphics, Samsung 500GB NVMe 980 PRO (C:), Samsung 970 Evo SSD (D:), Dell U2717D Monitor, Synology DS412+ 8TB NAS, Adobe CS6.
User avatar
John 'twosheds' McDonald
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4237
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:57 am
Location: Cheshire, UK

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby RJ Johnston » Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:00 am

When I'm in a hurry to see what my videos look like after shooting them with my Kodak Playtouch, I join the MPEG-4 1080p30 AVC/h.264 video and AAC audio clips and then just copy one big file to a thumb drive, which my Sony Blu-ray player accepts. Actually, it goes like this:

I use Videoredo TV Suite with H.264 to "join" the video into an elementary h.264 stream, which requires no recoding, and the audio into an mpeg audio stream which I then convert to an AC3 or PCM stream with a different converter. Then I mux the video and audio with the free TSMuxeR to create a M2TS file. The M2TS video file is copied to a thumb drive which is inserted into a Sony Blu-ray player.

The one big M2TS file can not be edited later without problems.

I have been using an internal HP Blu-ray burner for almost two years without creating any coasters. I stay away from USB 2.0 external burners, which have caused me a lot of problems. Maybe USB 3.0 will be different.
Dell XPS 8940 Intel 8-core 10th gen.-i7 10700K (3.8-5.1 GHz); 32GB DDR4 2933 MHz RAM; 512 GB SSD; 2 TB 7200 HD; BDRE-drive; NVIDIA(R) Geforce(R) RTX 2060 SUPER(TM) 8G8 GDDR6
User avatar
RJ Johnston
Premiere Member
Premiere Member
 
Posts: 3143
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Northern California, USA

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Gerry » Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:04 am

This is all really good news. Thanks! Gonna go pick me up a BD burner this afternoon and continue with my vision of the future. I'm still surprised, though, because I just expected to find things "farther along" with BD burners much more mainstream.

Lesson learned: don't be out of touch with technology for too long!

Great to be back!
Dell XPS 8500 desktop w/ Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.4ghz / 22 gigs RAM / Radeon HD7570 1g dedicated video memory/ PrEl 11 & 9 / Photoshop and Illustrator CS5 / After Effects CS4 / Olympus OM-D E-M5 DSLR (1080i HD video)

Time is money, life is change.
User avatar
Gerry
Senior Contributor
Senior Contributor
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: Minnetonka, MN

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Bobby » Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:58 pm

Hi Gerry.

Sorry to be late by a day, but RJ's point about the USB stick is a good one. BD and any technology using those old silver discs is so 20th century! Many people skipped BluRay entirely, and went from DVD to HD streaming, including myself. In my case, I output HD files and copy them to a media streaming box (Patriot Box Office in my case) and then plug that into my TV via HDMI cable. Works great and no discs to mess around with, burning problems, etc.

There are lots of ways to accomplish this; many TVs have direct USB input so you wouldn't even need a streaming box.

I think that is the way to go, and the reason that BD is languishing and why you haven't seen much progress. On the other hand, if you want to distribute to folks, like your family, discs are the most convenient way to do it. No solution is perfect!
Bobby (Bob Seidel)
User avatar
Bobby
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 3183
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: At the beach in NC

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Gerry » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:28 am

Thanks, Bob, and everyone. I'll really have to investigate streaming much more closely. Breaking the "hold it in my hand" habit will be hard.

In the meantime, I was able to land an LG burner this afternoon (only $60), and spent the afternoon shooting some HD video. Then I spent the evening trying to get Prel 9 to burn it to a disk. Wound up getting a "Chapter Overflow" message and spent a lot of time online investigating that.

I was finally able to burn a disk by using Phantomibility's Phantom BD disk, then burning the ISO to a Blu-Ray with IMGBURN. Worked great. I then stripped all the "funny business" out of my video (e.g. menus) and am trying to burn directly from Prel again.

But the bottom line for me is: the camera's video looked great onscreen and that was my biggest concern. So I keep the camera. Now HOW I get it to the screen is just a matter of details. Maybe Prel11 will hold the answer.
Dell XPS 8500 desktop w/ Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.4ghz / 22 gigs RAM / Radeon HD7570 1g dedicated video memory/ PrEl 11 & 9 / Photoshop and Illustrator CS5 / After Effects CS4 / Olympus OM-D E-M5 DSLR (1080i HD video)

Time is money, life is change.
User avatar
Gerry
Senior Contributor
Senior Contributor
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: Minnetonka, MN

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Gerry » Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:01 pm

Bobby wrote:In my case, I output HD files and copy them to a media streaming box


What settings do you use to output HD files? Seemingly I'm seeing that Prel only saves to disk, so I'm obviously missing something.
Dell XPS 8500 desktop w/ Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.4ghz / 22 gigs RAM / Radeon HD7570 1g dedicated video memory/ PrEl 11 & 9 / Photoshop and Illustrator CS5 / After Effects CS4 / Olympus OM-D E-M5 DSLR (1080i HD video)

Time is money, life is change.
User avatar
Gerry
Senior Contributor
Senior Contributor
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: Minnetonka, MN

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Chuck Engels » Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:07 pm

On the Share tab you have lots of options, everything from MP4 to WMV.
Here are some tutorials on the share options, one of them is free :)
http://muvipix.com/products.php?searchp ... =0&btn.y=0
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory.

2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
User avatar
Chuck Engels
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 18154
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Gerry » Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:40 pm

Thanks! I'll have to check it out.

I was able to make an MPEG (m2t) file today and successfully burned that to a Blu-Ray disc. Tried another one with menus and that didn't turn out so well. So it looks like Digital Architect Studio is in my future!

Thanks for the help!
Dell XPS 8500 desktop w/ Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.4ghz / 22 gigs RAM / Radeon HD7570 1g dedicated video memory/ PrEl 11 & 9 / Photoshop and Illustrator CS5 / After Effects CS4 / Olympus OM-D E-M5 DSLR (1080i HD video)

Time is money, life is change.
User avatar
Gerry
Senior Contributor
Senior Contributor
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: Minnetonka, MN

Re: Is HD video and burning not as far along as I thought?

Postby Peru » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:11 am

Gerry wrote:So it looks like DVD Architect Studio is in my future!

User avatar
Peru
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3690
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Peru, NY, USA


Return to Water Cooler 


Similar topics


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests