Suppose, outside of PrE9, I captured twice the same transmission of a show. In hard real life, each of the two analogue captures will have its own set of flaws, some dropped frames and some duplicate frames.
Duplicate frames? Two identical frames at the output side instead of two slightly different frames (moving pictures) from the input side. Stroboscopic. Don’t ask me why!
Furthermore, both captures started early, one earlier than the other.
So, as a start, I have two videos, let’s say, ~2 hours long, representing the same transmission of a show or a sports event.
Now I want to make a “best-of” these two analog captures.
I fairly well know how to do it with brilliant but technologically limited (VfW) VirtualDub. It is laborious but it is possible without re-encoding, thus preserving the original video quality throughout the entire processing cycles by VirtualDub's Direct stream Mode. Basically it consists of breaking down each of the two videos into sub-clips of good and bad parts and exchanging each bad part from one clip by the equivalent good part of the other clip. By this procedure I can get rid of all or most of bad spots in the capture. In very rare occasions a third capture would be needed to cure overlapping bad parts.
How can this be best and easiest done in PrE9?
How to exactly (down to the frame) synchronize both videos by their video content? (In VirtualDub I use the first hard scene change as first anchor point and trim the earlier starting video so that the anchor scene change will have the same frame# in each video).
Synchronization tends to get lost at spots with dropped or duplicate frames and has to be re-established in same way.
How is this best done in PrE9?
How to guarantee that audio sync does not get lost?
Best way to observe, frame by frame, which of the two videos has the better frame? And then, how to put the better frame to the good video track?
Finally, I have already learned that in PrE9 it is not possible to output the resulting good video track in its original quality in "Direct stream copy Mode" without any re-encoding, since such a mode is not supported in PrE9. So I will not ask how that can be done. In spite of that drawback, I would expect some good advantages at PreE9's side, especially in the inspecting and editing part of the workflow.
Has anybody here already done such a workflow?
How would you do, how should I do such a workflow within PrE9?