They're here! More Muvipix.com Guides by Steve Grisetti!
The Muvipix.com Guides to Premiere & Photoshop Elements 2024
As well as The Muvipix.com Guide to CyberLink PowerDirector 21
Because there are stories to tell
muvipix.com

Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Specific to Premiere Elements Version 8.

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby Bob » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:43 pm

Just a quick question. Is PRE8 a 64-bit app? I know Premiere Pro is as Adobe made it clear on their product page. I can't see if Pre8 is? I know Windows 7 will run just fine. More like in the XP-compatibility mode if you install the Win7 64-bit version.


Premiere Elements 8 and Premiere Pro CS4 are both 32 bit applications. 32-bit applications running on Vista or Windows 7 64-bit versions automatically run in 32-bit emulation. The statement on the Adobe product page for Premiere Pro just means that on a 64-bit OS it can run some tasks in a separate process for increased efficiency and to be able to utilize more memory overall.
User avatar
Bob
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:49 am
Location: Southern California, USA

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby DeafBug » Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:10 pm

Well thanks. I think it sucks that they won't make it 64-bit... yet. Just how do you make a movie that will consume a dual-layer DVD when Pre8 reads only 3.25GB of RAM? Or making a HD movie on a Blu-Ray? I know it will still do the job but I can't imagine how long it will take and all those pagefile swapping.
Intel Core Quad 2.4Ghz Q6600 on ASUS P5N32E-SLI with NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS, 8GB RAM, booting Windows 7 64-bit and 32-bit, and XP using BootIt NG.
MacBook Pro 2.8Ghz, 4GB RAM, anti-glare screen with Boot Camp
DeafBug
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:34 pm

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby Chuck Engels » Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:19 pm

Hi Brad,
I've created a number of dual layer DVDs and Blu-Ray discs with Premiere Elements and Premiere Pro.
They may take a little longer than they would if the programs were 64 bit instead of 32 bit.
But it does work and doesn't take a huge amount of time really.
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory.

2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
User avatar
Chuck Engels
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 18155
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby SteveG » Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:22 pm

Maybe this is a silly question then as I know many people have migrated to 64-bit, but what would be the advantage (going to 64-bit) since 32-bit can only use a max of 3-4 GB memory?
Steve G

Live in such a way that you would not be ashamed to sell your parrot to the town gossip.
--Will Rogers
SteveG
Premiere Member
Premiere Member
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Deerfield, IL

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby Chuck Engels » Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:31 pm

SteveG wrote:Maybe this is a silly question then as I know many people have migrated to 64-bit, but what would be the advantage (going to 64-bit) since 32-bit can only use a max of 3-4 GB memory?


I think Bob's response answers that pretty well

Bob wrote: on a 64-bit OS it can run some tasks in a separate process for increased efficiency and to be able to utilize more memory overall.
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory.

2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
User avatar
Chuck Engels
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 18155
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby SteveG » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:04 pm

Chuck,

You missed a few words before that. He wrote that

Premiere Pro just means that on a 64-bit OS


So I still don't see what's the point in using 64-bit for Premiere Elements.
Steve G

Live in such a way that you would not be ashamed to sell your parrot to the town gossip.
--Will Rogers
SteveG
Premiere Member
Premiere Member
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Deerfield, IL

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby John 'twosheds' McDonald » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:16 pm

Bob wrote:Premiere Elements 8 ....32 bit applications


Long and the short of it is that there is no advantage in running PrElv8 in a 64 bit environment (unless I have missed something - quite likely for me :???: )
AMD Ryzen 3900x 12C/24T, ASUS x570 mobo, Arctic Liquid Freezer ll 280, Win11 64 bit, 64GB RAM, Radeon RX 570 graphics, Samsung 500GB NVMe 980 PRO (C:), Samsung 970 Evo SSD (D:), Dell U2717D Monitor, Synology DS412+ 8TB NAS, Adobe CS6.
User avatar
John 'twosheds' McDonald
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4237
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:57 am
Location: Cheshire, UK

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby Chuck Engels » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:26 pm

A 64 bit OS has many more resources to handle RAM and other resources more efficiently.
Not to mention that a lot more RAM can be made available to other applications as well as the OS in general.

So running any 32 bit application on a 64 bit system will in effect be able to run more efficiently because the other processes and OS are running more efficiently. It isn't any help to Premiere Elements or Premiere Pro directly, but indirectly. With all the additional RAM available to the system in general it isn't a problem to give 3 GB to Premiere and still have plenty left over for the OS and other applications.

I hope that explains it better. I bet Bob or Bobby could put it into words that we could all understand.
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory.

2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
User avatar
Chuck Engels
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 18155
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby Bobby » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:45 pm

32-bit and 64-bit processor instructions run on the same processor and at the same processor clock speed. But 64-bit instructions can process more data within one instruction, IF the program is written or recompiled to use the 64-bit operations.

So 64-bit programs CAN process more data faster. In addition, the OS itself (Windows) can possibly be more efficient in managing its data structures and as noted above the OS can support more than 3GB of RAM. Having more RAM for applications will definitely speed things up as there is less paging space and time used.

So the bottom line is that the OS will run somewhat faster, and 64-bit applications can run a fair amount faster, especially if you run multiple applications at the same time.

Offsetting this is the hassle of making sure that device drivers for all your peripherals work on the 64-bit OS. But, hey, 64-bit is here, and here to stay. Go with it...
Bobby (Bob Seidel)
User avatar
Bobby
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 3183
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: At the beach in NC

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby jackfalbey » Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:10 am

I can't speak to Elements 8, but Pro CS4 on my Vista 64-bit drive encodes a LOT faster than it does on my XP Pro 32-bit drive (my workstation has 3 separate OS drives so I can triple-boot XP, Vista, and Win7 although I haven't played with 7 very much). Adobe programmed Media Encoder CS4 to spawn multiple instances of itself if the demand exceeded 2GB of RAM, so even though it's a 32-bit program it will use the extended resources of the system if available. Encoding h.264 from a DV-AVI timeline in Premiere uses 6.5GB of RAM and 100% of CPU as shown in Task Manager in Vista 64-bit, which obviously is a lot faster than the same function when running XP.

I don't think this "multi-spawning" feature is available in Elements 8...
ASRock Z77 Pro4, Xeon E3-1230 V2, Windows 7 64-bit, 32GB RAM, 3GB GTX 660 ti, 240GB SSD for OS/programs, 3x640GB in RAID0 for projects
Panasonic GH2; Adobe Creative Cloud
http://www.CMDStar.com
http://www.FamilyTreePhotography.co
User avatar
jackfalbey
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 1185
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Cleveland, TN

Re: Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Postby Chris B » Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:34 am

The other side to this is RAM. a 32bit OS can deal with 4GB of RAM at a a maximum. A 64 bit OS can handle a lot more (Motherboards are typically limited to 16-24GB). Windows will use this RAM to "cache" data from the hard drive to make it faster to access. This (in theory) should remove some of the disk thrashing that occurs when you're editing a project. Hard drives are the slowest component of any system these days - for comparison:

An i7 processor has an average memory read speed of around 20GB per second.
An intel SSD drive has a read speed of 240MB per second (0.24GB/sec)
A Segate 1tb hard drive has an average read speed of 140MB/ second (0.14GB/sec)
Intel Core i7 8700 - 32GB DDR4 - 500GB Evo 970 SSD - 3+2 TB HDD - GTX 1080- MSI Z370 Pro - Win10 64 bit - Cannon HV30 (PAL) - Sony A6000 - GoPro 3 Black
User avatar
Chris B
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:04 pm
Location: UK

Previous

Return to PRE Version 8 


Similar topics


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests