Other Video editors/authors that assist in video production.
by akcorcoran » Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:24 pm
argh - just pulled in my first VCR tape - and works like a charm to preview with Picture Controller 300 BUT the audio is not matching up! I have the setting for audio locked and it's at 48 kHz - are either of those wrong? Option is for unlocking audio (doesn't seem right) or going to 32kHz? (There is also a high-pitched undertone to audio - constant - so I'm hoping I can adjust that out somehow.)
I need to post somewhere to get tips for settings from ADVC300 users (lots of them - I'm lost but tinkering) - but wondering if the audio settings are my problem and a simple fix.
looking for help if you can - thanks! Alexa
-
akcorcoran
- Frequent Contributor
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:24 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
by Chuck Engels » Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:53 pm
Have you tried a different VCR? You might want to just try a few minutes with a couple different VCRs to see which will work the best. I am not sure if your Canopus model has TBC or not, that helps to keep things in sync. Someone here knows how it all works with the Canopus converters
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory. 2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
-
Chuck Engels
- Super Moderator
-
- Posts: 18155
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
-
by Peru » Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:58 pm
Chuck Engels wrote:Have you tried a different VCR? You might want to just try a few minutes with a couple different VCRs to see which will work the best. I am not sure if your Canopus model has TBC or not, that helps to keep things in sync. Someone here knows how it all works with the Canopus converters
I agree with Chuck. I had that problem once and changing VCRs fixed it.
-
Peru
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:34 pm
- Location: Peru, NY, USA
by akcorcoran » Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:02 pm
Okey doke. Good think I'm not afraid of crawling around with a zillion cords - need a desk 10 x bigger for all this equipment! TBC, Chuck - pardon ignorance, what's that?
-
akcorcoran
- Frequent Contributor
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:24 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
by Chuck Engels » Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:23 pm
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory. 2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
-
Chuck Engels
- Super Moderator
-
- Posts: 18155
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
-
by Chuck Engels » Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:28 pm
I didn't know what it was a couple years ago, in 2005 this stuff was all pretty new to me
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory. 2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
-
Chuck Engels
- Super Moderator
-
- Posts: 18155
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
-
by Ken Jarstad » Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:50 am
Just for clarity:
Since you are converting old analog tapes to digital you will not be using a "component" connection at all. You are likely using a "composite" video connection with the video signal coming in on the cable with a yellow colored connector. If any of your VCR machines have an S-Video output connector then that machine is most likely the one to use because it is designed to present a higher quality video signal to the S-Video output. Not always, but depending upon the units condition, it is usually the one to use.
If none of your VCRs have the S-Video output then use the one which presents the best looking picture to your PC while capturing. As has been pointed out previously, a tape which has difficulty playing properly - with picture aberrations - may play better on an alternate machine, even while the others play on a preferred machine. It all depends upon the original machine used to record the tape. You are fortunate to have several to try.
-=Ken Jarstad=- Linux Kubuntu 20.04, DIY ASRock MB, Ryzen 3 1200 CPU, 16 GB RAM, GT-710 GPU, 250 GB NVMe, edit primarily with Shotcut
-
Ken Jarstad
- Premiere Member
-
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:16 pm
-
by akcorcoran » Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:34 am
Thanks, Ken. I even checked my Panasonic VCR/DVD that is just last year's purchase, and it only has S-Video out for the DVD side and again only analog for the VCR side. Wondering if that's common? And, none of the old ones have S-Video out, not surprisingly. And, yes, sorry "composite" - don't know why the other was stuck in my head and coming out in the typing. Thx -
-
akcorcoran
- Frequent Contributor
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:24 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
by Ken Jarstad » Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:55 pm
It is highly unusual for a VHS VCR to have S-Video connections. A DVD player is capable of much higher resolution - hence the S-Video support in order to pass that resolution on to the TV. Then, of course, the TV has to have S-Video in to make this worthwhile. If you were going to make this a business - converting old analog tapes (you have one of the BEST A/D converters on the consumer market!) I would recommend a JVC machine with DigiPure circuitry. A very high-end JVC combo unit will support S-VHS and S-Video also. Here are some resources to do your own research, should you desire: http://www.digitalfaq.com/dvdguides/capture/playback.htmhttp://forum.videohelp.com/restoration-f43.html
-=Ken Jarstad=- Linux Kubuntu 20.04, DIY ASRock MB, Ryzen 3 1200 CPU, 16 GB RAM, GT-710 GPU, 250 GB NVMe, edit primarily with Shotcut
-
Ken Jarstad
- Premiere Member
-
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:16 pm
-
by akcorcoran » Sat Oct 25, 2008 12:32 am
Thanks, Ken - I appreciate the advice. We did invest and I have a commitment to quality, so it seems foolish to only invest part of the way. The flip side is that we are so rarely asked to do video tape to DVD - mostly camcorder tapes, so it's just a matter of what I spend on right away. My real focus is the final project created *with* this footage - making it into montages along with photos, music, artwork, more - turning them into gifts in other creative ways. The video conversion is, therefore, just a step along the way - but it needs to be of the best quality we can provide. So, it's a dilemma.
Thanks for the advice - I will research further and appreciate the help. Alexa
-
akcorcoran
- Frequent Contributor
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:24 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Return to Video Editors
Similar topics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests
|