They're here! More Muvipix.com Guides by Steve Grisetti!
The Muvipix.com Guides to Premiere & Photoshop Elements 2024
As well as The Muvipix.com Guide to CyberLink PowerDirector 21
Because there are stories to tell
muvipix.com

PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Other Video editors/authors that assist in video production.

PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Postby hpharley90 » Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:54 pm

I have been using my CS3 version more lately more than Elements because it seems to render faster when I press enter key.

So for the sake of wondering I made identical project in both programs.

The project is 02;49;16 long. It consists of 3 video tracks and 1 audio track.
Track 1 about 35 seconds long captured from my mini DV camera.
Track 2 a little longer clip. about 2 minutes from same camera..
Track 3 is a television I made in Photoshop Elements 4.0 that is 02;49;16 long.
Track 3 had a blue backround so I used the chroma key and similarity to 78% to get rid of blue and just leave the television and I also scaled track 3 down to 42.0 and track 2 down to 19 and repositioned both tracks and track 2 to be in side television(track 3).

It took PE2.0 67 minutes to render and PPro CS3 about 6 minutes.

Is this normal? :-k
Thanks
Richard


Dell XPS 8940-10th Gen i7-10700 processor (8-core,16M Cache. 2.9GHz)
48GB 3200MHz RAM Windows 10
User avatar
hpharley90
Premiere Member
Premiere Member
 
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:11 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Postby Steve Grisetti » Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:56 pm

That's seriously alarming, Richard.
HP Envy with 2.9/4.4 ghz i7-10700 and 16 gig of RAM running Windows 11 Pro
User avatar
Steve Grisetti
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 14444
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:11 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Re: PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Postby RJ Johnston » Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:03 am

Doesn't the Pro version have more than one quality level for previews? Maybe it is on a low quality setting.

EDIT: Just tried in Premiere Elements 4.0. Depending on the complexity of the chromakeying, I'm getting 2 to 5 minutes to render a preview for a similar setup.
User avatar
RJ Johnston
Premiere Member
Premiere Member
 
Posts: 3143
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Northern California, USA

Re: PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Postby hpharley90 » Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:01 pm

RJ thanks for giving me an update on how something similar works on your set up.
Pretty much how my Pro version is working.

RJ Johnston wrote:Doesn't the Pro version have more than one quality level for previews? Maybe it is on a low quality setting.

At this moment I don't know if Pro has more than one quality setting.
But I'm fine with Pro.
I'm wondering why such a large difference in rendering times between Pro and PE 2.0
Again PE 2.0 being the slower of the two.

I just went to Control panel, Add/Remove programs,PE2.0, Change/Remove and clicked repair.
Went through procedure.
Shut down computer then rebooted.
Opened PE 2.0. Changed chroma key similarity setting to 77% from 78%.
Got my red line and hit enter. I gave it 1 minute and it was still incredibly slow.
It only made it to around 2.43% of rendering 1 of 3 video previews in 60 seconds.
No change. Still taking a very long time.

Any body have any ideas on how to get PE 2.0 to render faster or why this could be happening? :???:
Thanks
Richard


Dell XPS 8940-10th Gen i7-10700 processor (8-core,16M Cache. 2.9GHz)
48GB 3200MHz RAM Windows 10
User avatar
hpharley90
Premiere Member
Premiere Member
 
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:11 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Postby jackfalbey » Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:31 am

Just a wild guess...

Maybe CS3 utilizes your PC's hardware to its fullest, but PE2.0 doesn't because it was written for older PCs? Although that still wouldn't account for that extreme difference...
ASRock Z77 Pro4, Xeon E3-1230 V2, Windows 7 64-bit, 32GB RAM, 3GB GTX 660 ti, 240GB SSD for OS/programs, 3x640GB in RAID0 for projects
Panasonic GH2; Adobe Creative Cloud
http://www.CMDStar.com
http://www.FamilyTreePhotography.co
User avatar
jackfalbey
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 1185
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Cleveland, TN

Re: PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Postby Paul LS » Thu Mar 20, 2008 12:05 pm

Good point Jack. CS3 can take advantage of video card processor on your graphics card for rendering (for some effects) whereas PE2 can not. In Playback settings in Desktop Display Mode is "Accelerated GPU Effects" checked.
Paul LS
Super Contributor
Super Contributor
 
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Postby Chuck Engels » Thu Mar 20, 2008 12:10 pm

Talking about specific effects, what about trying this with something other than the Chroma Key?
Maybe something simple like a Blur or Shadow/Highlight change?
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory.

2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
User avatar
Chuck Engels
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 18155
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: PProCS3 Premiere Elements 2.0 comparison

Postby hpharley90 » Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:47 pm

Sorry about being so long to respond to this thread.
jackfalbey wrote:Maybe CS3 utilizes your PC's hardware to its fullest, but PE2.0 doesn't because it was written for older PCs? Although that still wouldn't account for that extreme difference.


Thats a very good possibility.

Paul LS wrote:Good point Jack. CS3 can take advantage of video card processor on your graphics card for rendering (for some effects) whereas PE2 can not. In Playback settings in Desktop Display Mode is "Accelerated GPU Effects" checked.


No I don't Paul. I have standard checked.

Chuck Engels wrote:Talking about specific effects, what about trying this with something other than the Chroma Key?
Maybe something simple like a Blur or Shadow/Highlight change?


I just tried wave warp. Very slow.
Then I noticed even scaling down to whatever was slow.
So I put that problem to the side and moved on.
I went to capture a new project and I got the "capture device off line. Reset camera".
What the heck is going on I said to myself.
So I captured with PPCS3 and brought the DV-AVI into PE2.0 and I had a red line at top of time line.
The same thing with WinDV.
I decided to uninstall PE2.0 and reinstall and everything is fine now.
The chroma-key is not as fast as CS3 on rendering but everything else is the way it used to be.

I had to use MPEG Streamclip for the first time and I think that made a mess of things.
So I did an uninstall of MPEG Streamclip and registry clean before I reinstalled PE2.0and I'm back in business.
Thanks
Rich :-D :-D \:D/
Thanks
Richard


Dell XPS 8940-10th Gen i7-10700 processor (8-core,16M Cache. 2.9GHz)
48GB 3200MHz RAM Windows 10
User avatar
hpharley90
Premiere Member
Premiere Member
 
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:11 am
Location: Connecticut


Return to Video Editors 


Similar topics


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

cron