Talk about anything here.
by sidd finch » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:33 pm
From Gizmondo: IYou’ll want to seriously consider a compact SSD flash drive. They boast sustained transfer speeds topping out at an impressive 433 MB/s, and are finally available in larger 480 GB capacities.
OWC’s Envoy Pro mini isn’t the smallest flash drive you can buy, but it’s still certainly pocket-friendly. And what you sacrifice in a compact size you can more than make up for with speed, speed, and more speed. The fastest flash drives available from companies like SanDisk currently top out at 260 MB/s, while the OWC Envoy Pro mini manages 433 MB/s from a USB 3.0 connection.
Just be prepared to pay a premium for that speed and capacity, at least until these tiny SSD drives aren’t bleeding edge technology. OWC’s new 480 GB model will set you back a hefty $600 when available in a couple of weeks.
Sidd
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it." ..... Ferris Bueller
-
sidd finch
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 6542
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:20 pm
- Location: Cyberspace
by Chuck Engels » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:33 pm
Not in my budget
1. Thinkpad W530 Laptop, Core i7-3820QM Processor 8M Cache 3.70 GHz, 16 GB DDR3, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2GB Memory. 2. Cybertron PC - Liquid Cooled AMD FX6300, 6 cores, 3.50ghz - 32GB DDR3 - MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 4G, 4GB Video Ram, 1024 Cuda Cores.
-
Chuck Engels
- Super Moderator
-
- Posts: 18154
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
-
by John 'twosheds' McDonald » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:11 am
Can't recall where I read this but the pundit was saying that, in two years time in the mass market, spinning HDDs will be a dead technology as SSDs will have upped in capacity and dropped in price to become economically viable as HDD replacements.
AMD Ryzen 3900x 12C/24T, ASUS x570 mobo, Arctic Liquid Freezer ll 280, Win11 64 bit, 64GB RAM, Radeon RX 570 graphics, Samsung 500GB NVMe 980 PRO (C:), Samsung 970 Evo SSD (D:), Dell U2717D Monitor, Synology DS412+ 8TB NAS, Adobe CS6.
-
John 'twosheds' McDonald
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4237
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:57 am
- Location: Cheshire, UK
by Peru » Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:25 am
John 'twosheds' McDonald wrote: spinning HDDs will be a dead technology as SSDs will have upped in capacity and dropped in price to become economically viable as HDD replacements.
Very probably true. I was skeptical many years ago when I was told that darkrooms would be a thing of the past and that all photography would be digital.
-
Peru
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:34 pm
- Location: Peru, NY, USA
by sidd finch » Sat Apr 18, 2015 8:46 am
The first gen is always a bit expensive but the price and the capacity should come down quickly as the format takes off. This is a great option for a vacation where you want to store your footage but not lug around so much gear.
Sidd
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it." ..... Ferris Bueller
-
sidd finch
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 6542
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:20 pm
- Location: Cyberspace
by Kent Frost » Sat Apr 18, 2015 10:33 am
The speed and the size are what are getting that price tag. And even then, that's still a bit high in my opinion. I remember back in 2001 when I last worked at a camera store, we were selling the CF Type II cards, which were the same as regular CF memory cards in size and shape, but instead of being flash memory, it was an actual tiny spinning hard drive that held 1GB. That sucker was priced at $400 back then. Nowadays you can't even FIND a 1GB flash memory card of any kind. I think the lowest I see these days is maybe 4 or more probably 8GB for around $8 at walmart. That's what 14 years does.
Dell Studio XPS 8100, Intel Core i7 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 64-Bit Win7. Camera gear: 2x Canon 550D's, 1x Canon EOS 6D body, Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 & 17-50mm f2.8, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 & 24-70mm f/2.8L, and two 420EX flashes.
-
Kent Frost
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:48 pm
by Peru » Sat Apr 18, 2015 12:33 pm
Kent Frost wrote: CF Type II cards, which were the same as regular CF memory cards in size and shape, but instead of being flash memory, it was an actual tiny spinning hard drive that held 1GB.
Wow. I didn't know that. Nowadays you can't even FIND a 1GB flash memory card of any kind.
Actually... https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=c ... flash+card
-
Peru
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:34 pm
- Location: Peru, NY, USA
by Bob » Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:49 pm
Yeah, you can find them, you can even find 8" floppy disks, but they aren't being manufactured any more as far as I know. They aren't main stream. Kent's point is well taken.
-
Bob
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5925
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:49 am
- Location: Southern California, USA
by Peru » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:52 pm
Bob wrote: They aren't main stream. Kent's point is well taken.
I agree.
-
Peru
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:34 pm
- Location: Peru, NY, USA
by Kent Frost » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:39 pm
Ah, gotcha. I guess I just never felt the need to actually search for just 1GB of flash memory memory.
Dell Studio XPS 8100, Intel Core i7 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 64-Bit Win7. Camera gear: 2x Canon 550D's, 1x Canon EOS 6D body, Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 & 17-50mm f2.8, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 & 24-70mm f/2.8L, and two 420EX flashes.
-
Kent Frost
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:48 pm
by Kent Frost » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:43 pm
Also, I need to correct myself. That's not what the Type II's are. Wow, my memories are a bit antiquated and thus distorted. I had to look it up. They were the CF Microdrives. Same size as CF card (actually just slightly thicker), but with a small HDD.
Dell Studio XPS 8100, Intel Core i7 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 64-Bit Win7. Camera gear: 2x Canon 550D's, 1x Canon EOS 6D body, Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 & 17-50mm f2.8, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 & 24-70mm f/2.8L, and two 420EX flashes.
-
Kent Frost
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:48 pm
by sidd finch » Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:08 am
Moor's Law is alive and well and continuing to be true. http://www.mooreslaw.org/Sidd
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it." ..... Ferris Bueller
-
sidd finch
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 6542
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:20 pm
- Location: Cyberspace
by Ron Hunter » Sun Apr 19, 2015 1:23 pm
I'm a little confused. A USB thumb drive uses flash memory. A SSD uses flash memory. So what's the big deal with the $600 SSD thumb drive?
Is this being offered by the same people who sell $600 HDMI cables??
Desktop: HPE-580T, i7-950 (3.07GHz), 16GB RAM, Win'7 64-bit Home Premium, PSE12/PRE12, Lightroom 5. Laptop: MacBook Pro (retina), 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, Final Cut Pro X, Motion 5. Cameras (in use): Panasonic GH4/Canon HFR400/Canon HV30, GoPro HD Hero2.
-
Ron Hunter
- Super Contributor
-
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:13 pm
- Location: North Carolina
by sidd finch » Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:30 pm
USB 3.0 flash drives can read and write data at up to 124MB/s. SSDs are significantly faster than even the fastest USB flash drives, and usually transfer data quicker than even traditional platter-based hard drives. SSDs can transfer data at up to 360MB/s, whereas traditional drives usually cap out at rates between 120MB/s to 165MB/s. If you want to copy the contents of a 700MB file to a flash-memory drive, it would take you approximately 20 to 30 seconds with most USB drives and only less than 5 seconds in most cases with an SSD.
Sidd
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it." ..... Ferris Bueller
-
sidd finch
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 6542
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:20 pm
- Location: Cyberspace
Return to Water Cooler
Similar topics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests
|